Yes No Share to Facebook
Forum Selection Clause:
Attornment to Jurisdiction by Contract
Last Updated: August 22 2026
Question: Do forum selection clauses in a Canadian contract always get enforced, and when can I challenge the chosen court?
Answer: Forum selection clauses that expressly require disputes to be resolved in a particular Canadian court or jurisdiction are generally enforced, including where a party effectively attorns by conduct by participating without a timely objection, unless you can show a strong cause to disregard the clause or a mandatory law gives exclusive jurisdiction to another forum. Momentous.ca Corp. v. Canadian American Association of Professional Baseball Ltd., [2012] 1 S.C.R. 359 supports this approach and notes that courts will not be ousted when another forum has exclusive authority. For help reviewing your contract language and building arguments to enforce or challenge venue, Empowered Legal Services can connect you with a professional legal advocacy team of Lawyer & Paralegal to assess your options and next steps. Call (855) 808-6510 for a clear, practical consultation plan.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
Forum Selection Clause
Parties to contracts may expressly attorn by including a forum selection clause that specifies where disputes arising from the contractual relationship must be resolved. Such clauses may identify a specific province, city, or even county, as the agreed geographical location, forum. When a dispute arises, courts will generally uphold these agreements unless the party resisting enforcement can demonstrate a strong cause to disregard the forum selection clause. On this point, in Momentous.ca Corp. v. Canadian American Association of Professional Baseball Ltd., [2012] 1 S.C.R. 359, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that explicit contractual attornment will ordinarily be enforced, and that participation in proceedings without timely objection may also amount to attornment by conduct. Specifically, the Supreme Court said:
Note: Please contact Empowered Legal Services by phone at: (855) 808-6510 to discuss any specific questions that you may have.
[9] In Z.I. Pompey Industrie v. ECU-Line N.V., 2003 SCC 27, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 450, this Court confirmed that, in the absence of specific legislation, the proper test in determining whether to enforce a forum selection clause is discretionary in nature. It provides that unless there is a “strong cause” as to why a domestic court should exercise jurisdiction, order and fairness are better achieved when parties are held to their bargains.
As also explained in Momentous.ca, where a court or tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction, the parties are unable to use a forum selection clause, or other agreement, to oust that jurisdiction in favour of another forum. This principle ensures that legislatively mandated forums maintain authority over specific subject matters, safeguarding both the integrity of the adjudicative process and the public policy objectives underlying the statutory scheme.
[7] ... when another forum ― an arbitration panel, a tribunal or another court ― has the exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the claim, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice will not take jurisdiction, based upon agreement or statute.
Conclusion
A carefully drafted forum selection clause may serve as a powerful tool for securing predictability and efficiency in dispute resolution by channeling litigation to a chosen jurisdiction. These clauses reinforce the principle of attornment, whether explicit or implicit, by ensuring that litigants commit to a particular court or tribunal, thereby reducing uncertainty and jurisdictional disputes. Still, such provisions must be balanced against overriding public policy considerations, statutory exclusivity, or consumer protection principles, that may justify a court declining to enforce a forum selection clause.
NOTE: A significant multitude of inquiries featuring “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” frequently indicates a pressing requirement for competent legal assistance rather than a particular designation. In Ontario, licensed paralegals fall under the purview of the same Law Society that governs lawyers and possess the authority to advocate for clients in specific litigation matters. Advocacy, legal assessment, and procedural expertise are fundamental to this function. Empowered Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed jurisdiction, focusing on strategic placement, evidence preparation, and compelling advocacy designed to secure efficient and advantageous outcomes for clients.
